Message-ID: <30273837.1075855006406.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 15:45:55 -0700 (PDT)
From: richard.hanagriff@enron.com
To: lynn.blair@enron.com, rick.dietz@enron.com, dan.fancler@enron.com, 
	tracy.geaccone@enron.com, laura.giambrone@enron.com, 
	richard.hanagriff@enron.com, bert.hernandez@enron.com, 
	terry.kowalke@enron.com, lorraine.lindberg@enron.com, 
	tk.lohman@enron.com, michelle.lokay@enron.com, 
	christine.mcevoy@enron.com, tracy.minter@enron.com, 
	jan.moore@enron.com, debbie.moseley@enron.com, 
	amy.mulligan@enron.com, darrell.schoolcraft@enron.com, 
	linda.ward@enron.com, kimberly.watson@enron.com
Subject: TW imbal summary
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Hanagriff, Richard </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=RHANAGR>
X-To: Blair, Lynn </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Lblair>, Dietz, Rick </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rdietz>, Fancler, Dan </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Dfancle>, Geaccone, Tracy </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Tgeacco>, Giambrone, Laura </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Lgiambr>, Hanagriff, Richard </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rhanagr>, Hernandez, Bert </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Ahernan>, Kowalke, Terry </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Tkowalk>, Lindberg, Lorraine </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Llindbe>, Lohman, TK </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Tlohman>, Lokay, Michelle </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Mlokay>, McEvoy, Christine </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Cmcevoy>, Minter, Tracy </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Tminter>, Moore, Jan </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Jmoore3>, Moseley, Debbie </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Dmosele2>, Mulligan, Amy </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Amullig>, Schoolcraft, Darrell </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Dschool>, Ward, Linda </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Lward>, Watson, Kimberly </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Kwatson>
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \MLOKAY (Non-Privileged)\TW-Commercial Group
X-Origin: Lokay-M
X-FileName: MLOKAY (Non-Privileged).pst

attached is the latest TW imbalance summary

the reason that the volumetric valuations are lower is because indexes are approximately 80 cents lower than they were at 8/31/01.

 